<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raw Zudanotes I: Submission Agreement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/</link>
	<description>the webcomics blog about webcomics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fleen: Enjoy Our Semi-Abusive Opinion Mongering &#187; Spike Speaks</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-240749</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleen: Enjoy Our Semi-Abusive Opinion Mongering &#187; Spike Speaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-240749</guid>
		<description>[...] my email yesterday and received this unsolicited gem: &#8230;I was just looking over some old Fleen articles about Zuda&#8217;s contracts and I just cannot freaking get over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my email yesterday and received this unsolicited gem: &#8230;I was just looking over some old Fleen articles about Zuda&#8217;s contracts and I just cannot freaking get over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleen on Zuda at Undependent</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-133123</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleen on Zuda at Undependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-133123</guid>
		<description>[...] Gary Tyrrell shared his analysis of the Zuda contract docs in a series of posts on the submission agreement, the rights agreement, the services agreement, and his final thoughts. He concludes with: But as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gary Tyrrell shared his analysis of the Zuda contract docs in a series of posts on the submission agreement, the rights agreement, the services agreement, and his final thoughts. He concludes with: But as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleen: Your Favorite Faux-Muckrakers Since 2005 &#187; Zuda Thoughts: Final</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-132700</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleen: Your Favorite Faux-Muckrakers Since 2005 &#187; Zuda Thoughts: Final</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-132700</guid>
		<description>[...] Reviews   Okay, so we&#8217;ve picked apart the contracts, and we&#8217;ve all had plenty of time to think about things. Let&#8217;s put [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reviews   Okay, so we&#8217;ve picked apart the contracts, and we&#8217;ve all had plenty of time to think about things. Let&#8217;s put [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleen: Your Favorite Faux-Muckrakers Since 2005 &#187; Raw Zudanotes III: Services Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-131929</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleen: Your Favorite Faux-Muckrakers Since 2005 &#187; Raw Zudanotes III: Services Agreement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-131929</guid>
		<description>[...] and reversions under which you can submit.  First impression: the Services Agreement is between the Submission (short) and Rights (long) Agreements in length. As before, numbers are taken from the various [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and reversions under which you can submit.  First impression: the Services Agreement is between the Submission (short) and Rights (long) Agreements in length. As before, numbers are taken from the various [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Stephanides</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-131447</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Stephanides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-131447</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak to the merits of the contract as a whole, but it seems to me (as a non-lawyer) that you&#039;re reading too much into paragraph 10. Taking into account the phrase &quot;created by or for Zuda &lt;i&gt;without the benefit of the Submission&lt;/i&gt;&quot; (my emphasis), I think they&#039;re trying to protect themselves from being sued in case they already have something similar to a Zuda Submission in the works, or someone within DC comes up with a similar idea without having read the Submission. (A lot of entertainment companies won&#039;t read any unsolicited submissions for this reason.) Of course, they could copy your submission and claim that they&#039;d come up with it independently; but they could do that even without Paragraph 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the merits of the contract as a whole, but it seems to me (as a non-lawyer) that you&#8217;re reading too much into paragraph 10. Taking into account the phrase &#8220;created by or for Zuda <i>without the benefit of the Submission</i>&#8221; (my emphasis), I think they&#8217;re trying to protect themselves from being sued in case they already have something similar to a Zuda Submission in the works, or someone within DC comes up with a similar idea without having read the Submission. (A lot of entertainment companies won&#8217;t read any unsolicited submissions for this reason.) Of course, they could copy your submission and claim that they&#8217;d come up with it independently; but they could do that even without Paragraph 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 25, 2007: A comic that no longer makes any sense</title>
		<link>http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-131336</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 25, 2007: A comic that no longer makes any sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleen.com/archives/2007/09/24/raw-zudanotes-i-submission-agreement/#comment-131336</guid>
		<description>[...] Gary Tyrrell combs through the Zudacomics submission agreement. Christopher Butcher and T Campbell each have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gary Tyrrell combs through the Zudacomics submission agreement. Christopher Butcher and T Campbell each have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
